• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

ZMO Law

  • About Us
  • Attorneys
    • ZMO Law Team
    • Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma
    • Tess Cohen
    • Shane Finn
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Civil Rights
    • Healthcare Crimes
    • Sex Crimes
    • Federal Crimes
    • Victims Rights
  • In The News
  • ZMO Law Blog
  • Contact

Jul 12 2016 Child Pornography, Civil Rights Advocacy, Crime and Technology, First Amendment, Prisoners' Rights, Sentencing, Sex Crimes, What's New, White Collar Crime

Sixth Circuit: Okay to Consider Jury’s Belief that Child Pornography Sentence Too Harsh

By Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma

Does the jury’s opinion matter at sentencing? Almost never. But last week, a Sixth Circuit panel said that a trial judge did not go too far by polling the jury about their opinion on sentencing in a child pornography case and considering their answer under 18 USC 3553(a). The below-Guidelines sentence was affirmed in U.S. v. Collins.

After an Ohio jury found defendant Ryan Collins guilty of receiving and distributing child pornography, Judge James S. Gwin asked the jurors what the defendant’s sentence should be. The average recommended sentence among jurors was 14.5 months, with individual responses ranging from 0-60 months.

Under the federal sentencing guidelines, the defendant’s recommended sentence was 262-327 months, more than eighteen times the average sentence recommended by the jurors.

Judge Gwin departed from the range recommended by the Guidelines and issued the mandatory minimum sentence of 60 months, citing the jury poll as one factor in his decision. The jury poll, he explained, conveys the public view of the gravity of the offense, something the Guidelines are supposed to take into account but clearly failed to do here.

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the sentence, finding that Judge Gwin did not abuse his discretion. The jury’s essential role is a fact-finding one, but since they were not polled until after they had reached a verdict, there was no interference with that primary function. And while the jury is not the proper body to make a sentencing determination, the judge did not defer to their recommendation completely but rather referenced it among other factors. It is perfectly acceptable, the Sixth Circuit found, to take account of a jury poll as one input in the sentencing decision.

The jurors’ sentiment in this case reflects that the “eccentric” child pornography sentencing guidelines are out of touch with community opinion. By allowing judges to take jury polls about sentencing into consideration, the Sixth Circuit has approved a potential attack on the outlandishly high results yielded by mechanical imposition of the child porn Guidelines.

Primary Sidebar

Topics

  • Child Pornography
  • Civil Rights Advocacy
  • Crime and Technology
  • First Amendment
  • News
  • Prisoners' Rights
  • Sentencing
  • Sex Crimes
  • What's New
  • White Collar Crime

Search

Recent Entries

  • Welcoming attorney Shane Finn to ZMO Law April 28, 2025
  • Is Matt Gaetz a sex trafficker? November 20, 2024
  • Victory in the Fourth Department September 28, 2024

CONTACT US NOW

NEW YORK: 212-685-0999
24 HOUR: 515-966-5291

Name(Required)
Previous Can you get a life sentence for making child pornography?
Next A Child Sex Crime Sting that Did Not Work

Footer

ZMO Law PLLC

We serve the following localities: New York City including New York County, Bronx County, Kings County, and Queens County; and Westchester County.

Learn More

Practice Areas
  • Sex Crimes
  • Federal Crimes
  • Civil Rights
  • Health Care Crimes
Contact Us

ZMO Law PLLC
353 Lexington Avenue, Suite 900
New York, NY 10016
Phone: (212) 685-0999

  • linkedin
  • facebook-alt
  • x
  • Criminal Court Process
  • Glossary of Legal Terms
  • NYS Statement of Client’s Rights
  • Criminal Investigation
  • Servicios en Español
  • Reviews
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Copyright © 2025 · ZMO Law PLLC | Sitemap