• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

ZMO Law

  • About Us
  • Attorneys
    • ZMO Law Team
    • Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma
    • Tess Cohen
    • Shane Finn
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Civil Rights
    • Healthcare Crimes
      • Opioid Over-Prescription
    • Sex Crimes
    • Federal Crimes
    • Victims Rights
  • In The News
  • ZMO Law Blog
  • Contact

Apr 16 2015 Child Pornography, Civil Rights Advocacy, Crime and Technology, First Amendment, Prisoners' Rights, Sentencing, Sex Crimes, What's New, White Collar Crime

Judge: Cops Who Shot Barricaded EDP in the Back of the Head Won’t Stand Trial

By Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma

In a series of quick orders, Judge Katherine Forrest of the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment this week to New York City police officers who shot Mauricio Jaquez at least five times, including in the back of the head, at his apartment in the Bronx. They said he came at them with a knife; the forensic evidence showed otherwise. The trial scheduled to begin on Monday has been adjourned. Judge Forrest has so far not explained her decisions except to say that the City of New York and the officers’ motion to exclude the plaintiffs’ medical expert was granted and the grant of summary judgment flowed from that.

The trial court’s decisions will be appealed to the Second Circuit which previously reversed Judge Forrest after she accused Mr. Jaquez’s widow of abandoning the case. The reason that time? The widow never got court mail that was sent to a homeless shelter where she and her three children were forced to live after her husband was shot and killed by the police.

This time, plaintiffs, represented by the ZMO Law PLLC, opposed the City’s last ditch effort at summary judgment (which ultimately succeeded in the district court). The forensic evidence and the defendants’ contradictory statements are both complex and compelling; here is how we summed them up:

In short, with or without expert testimony, a reasonable finder of fact could find that the defendants acted unreasonably in forcibly entering the apartment when only Mr. Jaquez was inside, then trying to break a hole through the kitchen wall, screaming at Mr. Jaquez, Tasering Mr. Jaquez as he walked down the hall unarmed, beating him with a ballistic shield when he retreated, Tasering him two more times, hitting his right forearm and stomach with rubber bullets, Tasering him again, then opening fire, shooting him from above and denying him medical attention until he was certain to die.

For more information on the Estate of Jaquez case or on excessive use of force by the New York City Police Department, call our office at (212) 685-0999.

Primary Sidebar

Topics

  • Child Pornography
  • Civil Rights Advocacy
  • Crime and Technology
  • First Amendment
  • Healthcare Fraud
  • News
  • Prisoners' Rights
  • Sentencing
  • Sex Crimes
  • What's New
  • White Collar Crime

Search

Recent Entries

  • A Little Drug Relief? June 5, 2025
  • Welcoming attorney Shane Finn to ZMO Law April 28, 2025
  • Is Matt Gaetz a sex trafficker? November 20, 2024

CONTACT US NOW

NEW YORK: 212-685-0999
24 HOUR: 515-966-5291

Name(Required)
Previous Police Shooting Case Headed for Trial
Next A Word about Baltimore, Charges, and Grand Juries

Footer

ZMO Law PLLC

We serve the following localities: New York City including New York County, Bronx County, Kings County, and Queens County; and Westchester County.

Learn More

Practice Areas
  • Sex Crimes
  • Federal Crimes
  • Civil Rights
  • Health Care Crimes
Contact Us

ZMO Law PLLC
353 Lexington Avenue, Suite 900
New York, NY 10016
Phone: (212) 685-0999

  • linkedin
  • facebook-alt
  • x
  • Criminal Court Process
  • Glossary of Legal Terms
  • NYS Statement of Client’s Rights
  • Criminal Investigation
  • Servicios en Español
  • Reviews
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Copyright © 2025 · ZMO Law PLLC | Sitemap